
| URL: | |
| Embed: |
![]() |
Launch and almost-catch Posted by: jayjfadd
Video duration: 31 seconds someone definitely makes contact with the descending potato Related: potato, gun Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
![]() |
Post launch chatter Posted by: jayjfadd
Video duration: 12 seconds fighting over the launched glowstick Related: potato, gun Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
![]() |
Mattster Wizard explains Potato Gunnery Posted by: jayjfadd
Video duration: 5 seconds i mean... Related: potato, gun Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
![]() |
Beer in the hole! Posted by: jayjfadd
Video duration: 18 seconds a vertical potato gun shot Related: potato, gun Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
![]() |
Potato Gun Launch and Bounce Posted by: jayjfadd
Video duration: 378 seconds it's hard to put it in! Related: potato, gun Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
![]() |
Potato Gun Launch Posted by: jayjfadd
Video duration: 310 seconds after a hard time putting in the gas, a glowsticked potato is launched and retrieved Related: potato, gun Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
![]() |
Water powered engine Posted by: jayjfadd
Video duration: 159 seconds A demonstration of a water-powered engine. Go 100 miles on 4 ounces of water. Related: h2o, engine, water, power, hho Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
Latest comments made on this video:
By: sapoty. on 02 Aug 10, 01:00:55
Dear Gullible Ignoramouses, Using electricity to turn water into "HHO" is at the very best 60% efficient. To power a car directly with electricity is at least 80 to 90% efficient. That is why the non-ignorant world is investing billions into electric cars. If you don't understand what I just wrote, go drink some water.
By: kapsakorsten. on 22 Jul 10, 23:05:18
0:19 ok wtf 6000 K...MIG welders reach that temp. (or even higher ones) but then you have to deal with intense light produced by the electric arc... O SHIT ITS FAUX NEWS NEVERMIND
By: Majicgarnet. on 18 Jun 10, 20:56:49
@drifking911 Ya know that's what all Physicists and generally any classically educated person says when they see this, so then why does it work? Saw one! It worked! Yes it draws some amps from the car generator and puts a little drag on the engine. But it works. Must be looking at it wrong, Fission works too. It's meant to augment gas engine not run it. Chemical reaction and electrolysis. Must use a catalyst. Gets 50% less Gas and 20% Just do it right!
By: Majicgarnet. on 18 Jun 10, 20:56:15
Ya know that's what all Physicists and generally any classically educated person says when they see this, so then why does it work? Saw one! It worked! Yes it draws some amps from the car generator and puts a little drag on the engine. But it works. Must be looking at it wrong, Fission works too. It's meant to augment gas engine not run it. Chemical reaction and electrolysis. Must use a catalyst. Gets 50% less Gas and 20% more HP. Try it! Just make sure you do it right. Higher amps= More H.
By: DynastyPercussion. on 17 Jun 10, 20:07:16
@drifking911 lol I was VERY dizzy that day so I can't really explain what I meant but I agree with you about the loss of energy. If you can figure out how to "fill in the gaps" than you'll be rich before you even know it. =P
By: drifking911. on 17 Jun 10, 15:56:12
@DynastyPercussion The only way to recuperate energy puted in a moving car is to use the brakes as dynamos instead of producing heat. if you add like an ultra high resistance alternator on the wheels it should produce electricity.But the ammount of electricity will always be less than the energy it took to bring you to that speed. And if you add a permanent system of dynamos on the engine...its simple it will just produce less energy than it took from the restriction it produce on the engine.
By: DynastyPercussion. on 13 Jun 10, 03:34:33
@drifking911 The engine isn't complete I say...if what you say is true then there should be a self regenerating electricity source...I'm talking out of my you-know-what but I think if the initial electricity feeds the water converter and powers the vehicles engine(if that's how it works) which produces electricity through friction it can create an unlimited fuel source for vehicles...I guess? =P
By: pjvenner. on 07 Jun 10, 01:34:37
Producing clean energy from hydrogen & oxygen isn't rocket science. Living long enough to get it into mass production? Move over Einstein!
By: smittty1911. on 05 Jun 10, 02:57:01
@ajbauto denny klein was not, youre thinking of the older dude.
By: rollthetape88. on 19 May 10, 01:01:04
@drifking911 plus current batteries lose there charge over time, where as HHO won't.
By: Artoniworld. on 15 Apr 10, 04:22:05
How Cool is that!?
By: ajbauto. on 06 Apr 10, 03:23:03
he was assasinated
By: ajbauto. on 06 Apr 10, 03:22:53
he was assasinated
By: drifking911. on 28 Mar 10, 19:42:41
@ewolfcross Its pretty obvious that the automobile industry is manipulated by lobbyist.I had a 90 celica and now a 07 corolla and guess what the corola take as much gaz has the heavy more powerfull older technology celica.i am sure that they can make a car that run with 1/3 of that gaz easily with the technology today.But believe me hydrogen is not the solution.The best you can get with water electrolysis is 70% efficiency. and thats with the best cells. Forget about having over 100% efficiency
By: novusignum. on 27 Mar 10, 07:21:42
testing .............
By: novusignum. on 27 Mar 10, 07:21:11
test
By: novusignum. on 27 Mar 10, 07:19:45
Hey you sheep-minds. It easy to talk and criticize. Prove you assertions with experimental evidence.
By: ewolfcross. on 27 Mar 10, 07:14:42
@drifking911 Don't take for grant everything you hear even from the scientific community. They are also corrupted and controlled by hidden groups of immoral barely-humans. This is not a matter of faith. Before you assert something, research it, experiment it and then declare your conclusions. I am prevented there is a strong conspiracy to avert any human development outside those dark groups of criminals either hidden as rats or masked as government officials.
By: CrashOverdrive4. on 22 Mar 10, 05:26:57
I like the part at the end about how much they would start charging for water
By: CrashOverdrive4. on 22 Mar 10, 05:26:13
@moegreen2 good point on the amount of electricity
By: hoppper26. on 12 Mar 10, 03:34:57
hahaha Ridge3210 did you ever here of the water cycle????? you know when water evaporates and goes into the sky then turns into CLOUDS then it rains and starts the process all over again.
By: tomboi1978. on 08 Mar 10, 04:24:49
And yet I see no cars running on water. Hmmm...
By: moegreen2. on 19 Feb 10, 11:12:02
2 H2(g) + O2(g) ? 2 H2O(l) + 572 kJ So too reverse it you need 572kJ, there is no way around this as far as I know. I guess he is just closer too this 572kJ then anyone else.
By: arnie71. on 18 Feb 10, 22:53:36
I think Browns way of doing it is more of a brute force way of using a lot of energy for the electrolysis. I think that there are better, more efficient way to do it. Using less energy.
By: moegreen2. on 18 Feb 10, 22:34:19
Yes, as far as I know the cost of converting H2O into HHO would need more electricity than HHO can create. So you need cheap electricity. If you combine this technology with a watermill or windmill, it's green energy. This would solve the waist problem with the electric cars batteries, and it might be powerfull enough for bigger engines then cars too. I think it sounds geat. Too bad he got a patent, this should be free. The gass is also known as "browns gas" I think.